
Bill Maher’s guerrilla documentary Religulous is pretty much what I expected after reading his article in the July 2008 Playboy, in both its strengths and its weaknesses. Not always but often, religion is ridiculous. Maher chooses some highly deserving targets for his mockery of the excesses of religious fundamentalism: creationist theme parks, ex-gay ministries, and all the symbols of peace that somehow keep turning into banners of war. But by smearing everyone who believes in God as part of the problem, an “enabler” or “Mafia wife” of the dangerous crazies, he needlessly alienates someone like me.
Atheists with more intellectual vigor than Maher, such as Steven Pinker, acknowledge the philosophical wiggle room that still exists for a debatable Supreme Being of some kind. Nor is this a “God in the gaps” of present scientific knowledge, to be debunked when the eventual facts come in. Pinker is humble enough as a scientist to remember that philosophy necessarily precedes science, because the scientific enterprise is structurally incapable of bridging some of the gaps. Some arguments for the existence of God have respectable intellectual nuance. If anti-intellectualism is what makes fundamentalism such a threat in the first place, let’s stick to the subject.
Posted by Brian Sorgatz at 1:48 PM
![]()