Site Meter Reflections on Playboy: On teenage sexuality, Bill Maher can’t keep his story, um, straight

April 2, 2007

On teenage sexuality, Bill Maher can’t keep his story, um, straight

For the second time in a day, I get to smack down an age-of-majority hypocrite. If you hurry, you can still get Maher’s April Playboy interview from newsstands. This excerpt is for every nerd joke that every Reason subscriber has ever endured at the expense of an unclassical pseudoliberal:
Playboy: Would you support [Bill] Clinton [for president again if you could]?

Maher: Sure. He has a reputation as a party animal because of the Monica Lewinsky situation, but basically he’s a wonk. He can do Monica and run the country. He’s a multitasker. If he had been president when Katrina hit, he would have been in New Orleans three days before the storm. He wouldn’t have slept. Yes, he would have been getting blown—come on, Slick Willie in the Big Easy? He would have had some excellent étouffée. But he would have been working the whole time. I think the country has learned a lesson: If he can do the job, let the guy be who he is. People don’t care about sex.

Playboy: They cared about Mark Foley.

Maher: Monica Lewinsky was an adult. Foley went after boys. [sic: The 16-year-old in question was above the age of consent in the District of Columbia.] Actually, I wasn’t terribly taken aback by Foley. He was like a college professor, in a job where every year there’s a new wave of fresh meat. He would look over the field and decide. He probably had pretty good radar to know which kids were amenable. From the evidence we have, he tried to do something only after they were out of the page program. If a 19-year-old gay kid wants to go out with an older guy, why not? The guys his own age are probably dumb doofuses [sic: doofi].

Playboy: But even after leaving their jobs as pages, they were far younger than Foley.

Maher: Look, I’m a 51-year-old man, and I go out with girls in their early 20s. I’d be hypocritical if I said it’s ridiculous for a gay man to do that. I’m very libertarian about love. I’m the only guy I’ve ever heard who defends Mary Kay Letourneau.

Playboy: Are you saying teachers should be allowed to have sex with their 13-year-old students, as she did, and not go to jail?

Maher: I think it’s a little offbeat, but you know, I believe in the double standard. If a 28-year-old male teacher is screwing a 13-year-old girl, that’s a crime. But with Debra Lafave [another teacher who had sex with a student] screwing her 14-year-old boy student, the crime is that we didn’t get it on videotape. Was he being taken advantage of? I wish I had been taken advantage of like that. What a memory she gave him! I would think he’s a champion among his friends. Are you kidding? Even with Michael Jackson—

Playboy: You’re being remarkably open-minded.

Maher: Woody Allen is the one we might have been wrong about. I was pretty hard on him on my show, but how many years has his relationship continued? Maybe that, like Letourneau’s, was true love. If you look at him or Letourneau, who is still with the guy after her time in jail—they have two kids—the lesson is love will take the form it’s going to take. Sometimes it’s at great variance with the mainstream. I don’t think teachers should be allowed to do that. I think they should be fired. But to send that woman to jail and separate them all those years?
Libertarian about love? Bullshit, Bill. In context, your exception for teenage men and their older women is reverse puritanism at best.

Posted by Brian Sorgatz at 3:03 PM

  • Blogger ChilledBeer left this comment at April 4, 2007 2:58 PM  
    so what the hell are you really? a conservative idiot or a plain stupid person?
    There was nothing wrong in Bill's comments about teacher-student relationships..infact this is so psychic i blogged about the same thing 3 days back.

    http://blogbible-general.blogspot.com
  • Blogger Brian Sorgatz left this comment at April 4, 2007 6:02 PM  
    Sorry, CB, but Maher’s attitude towards male sexuality (but not female sexuality, interestingly) sounds too much like a junior-high locker room for my taste.
  • Anonymous Anonymous left this comment at December 5, 2007 2:44 PM  
    lmao... last time I checked male and female sexuality were different. What is your position anyway? 25 Year old men should be able to screw teenage girls? That's crazy. A fourteen year old boy having a consensual sexual relationship with an older women is in no way immoral. But an older man having sex with a teenage girl? What is your understanding of the male-female sexual relationship? I cannot imagine what it could be.
  • Blogger Brian Sorgatz left this comment at December 6, 2007 5:28 PM  
    Listen to me, Anonymous: there is no naturally obvious, specific ethical code to be extrapolated from the fact that men and women tend to differ in predictable ways. I refuse to repeat myself, so you’ll have to offer reasons from the tangible world of causes and effects to justify the double standard that you happen to favor here. If you can’t do that, you’re wasting my time on this particular thread.
  • Post a Comment

    « Home

    Create a Link