Site Meter Reflections on Playboy: Andrew Sullivan: freedom for me, but not for teens

April 2, 2007

Andrew Sullivan: freedom for me, but not for teens

Radley Balko and Andrew Sullivan have each given The New York Times’ David Brooks a good pounding for his defense of government growth under George W. Bush. Brooks had it coming, but Sullivan has revealed a chink in his own armor. According to a Yiddish proverb, a liar needs to have a good memory. Sullivan reminds me that a non-libertarian needs the same trait to avoid embarrassment about the forms of government meddling that he happens to like.

“I’m a small government Goldwater conservative, but I think compulsory high school education is worth the trade-off of freedom,” says Sullivan in passing. Ah, but of course, someone else’s freedom is always easy to trade off. (For example, the sodomy laws that the U.S. Supreme Court struck down just a few years ago were academic problems at worst for Sullivan’s conservative heterosexual friends.) Federal and state governments conveniently give teenagers only as much autonomy as soccer moms see fit to give them—even though societies where life as an adult is much harder have often considered their members adults at 14. What I’ve said about teenagers may be vulgar, but there is little hyperbole in it, I’m afraid.

Posted by Brian Sorgatz at 9:06 AM

Post a Comment

« Home

Create a Link